delayed messages

[Paul Henry]

<02 Jan 06>, Stephen Hart wrote to Paul Henry:

SH> The gateway cannot be run automagically and still screen out UseNet
SH> "spam and smut" to accepted FidoNet standards. I know this seems an
SH> archaic attitude, but FidoNet message area standards still apply.

You mean that the spammers spam alt.moose.rights? Shame, shame. Is nothing
sacred?

I have no problem with a moderated newsgroup. The real question is, isn't
there an easier way to babysit the Internet? Like a good Bayesian filter?
Some secret code only FidoGeeks<tm> will know? What about snugglebunnies?
Are they gated to Usenet without filtering? Acquiring minds want to know.


... Handy Guide to Modern Science: 1. If it's green or it wiggles, it's biology.
2. If it stinks, it's chemistry. 3. If it doesn't work, it's physics.

[snowzone]

Post by Paul Henry
Like a good Bayesian filter?

i think popfile supports nntp now... that's about as good as it gets
with Bayes filters

Post by Paul Henry
What about snugglebunnies?

i'm afraid sandbox lingo may be lost on steve... i left it when the 12
year old's took over...the above being a great example of all the
'in-ness'.